Skip to main content
Shortened question to be <400 characters, making it suitable for example question.
Source Link

In signal detection theory, one typically uses "signal" and "no signal" responses to analyze the data (that is, the analysis is based on a discrete choice for each trial, effectively generating the four possible outcomes "hit", "miss", "false alarm" and "correct rejection").

Is there any standard way to also incorporate response time into the signal detection analysis? If so, what are some seminal papers regarding this?

In signal detection theory, one typically uses "signal" and "no signal" responses to analyze the data (that is, the analysis is based on a discrete choice for each trial, effectively generating the four possible outcomes "hit", "miss", "false alarm" and "correct rejection").

Is there any standard way to also incorporate response time into the signal detection analysis? If so, what are some seminal papers regarding this?

In signal detection theory, one typically uses "signal" and "no signal" responses to analyze the data (that is, the analysis is based on a discrete choice for each trial, generating the four possible outcomes "hit", "miss", "false alarm" and "correct rejection").

Is there any standard way to also incorporate response time into the signal detection analysis?

tag
Link
Artem Kaznatcheev
  • 12.3k
  • 5
  • 70
  • 164
edited tags
Link
Jeromy Anglim
  • 30.8k
  • 11
  • 93
  • 221
added tags
Link
Artem Kaznatcheev
  • 12.3k
  • 5
  • 70
  • 164
Loading
edited tags
Link
Artem Kaznatcheev
  • 12.3k
  • 5
  • 70
  • 164
Loading
deleted 7 characters in body
Source Link
Speldosa
  • 1.4k
  • 2
  • 15
  • 29
Loading
Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackCogSci/status/176224910866268161
Added tag, improved formatting/spelling.
Source Link
Steven Jeuris
  • 3.5k
  • 5
  • 31
  • 56
Loading
Post Migrated Here from stats.stackexchange.com (revisions)
Source Link
Speldosa
  • 1.4k
  • 2
  • 15
  • 29
Loading