Skip to main content
Post Closed as "Needs details or clarity" by Seanny123, mrt, AliceD, Arnon Weinberg, Berit Larsen
add important info.
Source Link

It is certainly a great fact/truth that the ability of thought to describe or reconfigure sensory experience is ultimately dependent upon the extent to which thought is similar to sensory experience. It occurs to me that dreams make thought more like sensory experience in general, thereby improving upon memory and understanding. Thoughts are invisible. The space in dreams is visible and invisible in fundamental equilibrium and balance, thereby making sensory experience maximally consistent with/similar to thought. This improves upon memory and understanding. There is no outsmarting the genius of dreams.

Dreams balance being and experience. Dream experience is possible/potential and actual in balance. Dreams balance conscious and unconscious experience. In dreams, we are relatively unconscious; and yet we are still conscious.

Thoughts are invisible. Do dreams improve upon memory and understanding by making the sensory experience MORE LIKE thought? This is a very important question which can improve upon our understanding of what dreams really are as well. Indeed, dreams fundamentally average and balance our bodily/visual experience. Notice that dreams involve balanced and maximum middle strength force/energy feeling/touch consistent with the experience of middle distance in/of space and instantaneity.

Consider that dream experience and waking experience are fundamentally related, and they are fundamentally linked; and they are separate experiences.

It is certainly a great fact/truth that the ability of thought to describe or reconfigure sensory experience is ultimately dependent upon the extent to which thought is similar to sensory experience. It occurs to me that dreams make thought more like sensory experience in general, thereby improving upon memory and understanding. Thoughts are invisible. The space in dreams is visible and invisible in fundamental equilibrium and balance, thereby making sensory experience maximally consistent with/similar to thought. This improves upon memory and understanding. There is no outsmarting the genius of dreams.

Dreams balance being and experience. Dream experience is possible/potential and actual in balance. Dreams balance conscious and unconscious experience.

It is certainly a great fact/truth that the ability of thought to describe or reconfigure sensory experience is ultimately dependent upon the extent to which thought is similar to sensory experience. It occurs to me that dreams make thought more like sensory experience in general, thereby improving upon memory and understanding. Thoughts are invisible. The space in dreams is visible and invisible in fundamental equilibrium and balance, thereby making sensory experience maximally consistent with/similar to thought. This improves upon memory and understanding. There is no outsmarting the genius of dreams.

Dreams balance being and experience. Dream experience is possible/potential and actual in balance. Dreams balance conscious and unconscious experience. In dreams, we are relatively unconscious; and yet we are still conscious.

Thoughts are invisible. Do dreams improve upon memory and understanding by making the sensory experience MORE LIKE thought? This is a very important question which can improve upon our understanding of what dreams really are as well. Indeed, dreams fundamentally average and balance our bodily/visual experience. Notice that dreams involve balanced and maximum middle strength force/energy feeling/touch consistent with the experience of middle distance in/of space and instantaneity.

Consider that dream experience and waking experience are fundamentally related, and they are fundamentally linked; and they are separate experiences.

add info. to answer question
Source Link

It is certainly a great fact/truth that the ability of thought to describe or reconfigure sensory experience is ultimately dependent upon the extent to which thought is similar to sensory experience. It occurs to me that dreams make thought more like sensory experience in general, thereby improving upon memory and understanding. Thoughts are invisible. The space in dreams is visible and invisible in fundamental equilibrium and balance, thereby making sensory experience maximally consistent with/similar to thought. This improves upon memory and understanding. There is no outsmarting the genius of dreams.

Dreams balance being and experience. Dream experience is possible/potential and actual in balance. Dreams balance conscious and unconscious experience.

It is certainly a great fact/truth that the ability of thought to describe or reconfigure sensory experience is ultimately dependent upon the extent to which thought is similar to sensory experience. It occurs to me that dreams make thought more like sensory experience in general, thereby improving upon memory and understanding. Thoughts are invisible. The space in dreams is visible and invisible in fundamental equilibrium and balance, thereby making sensory experience maximally consistent with/similar to thought. This improves upon memory and understanding. There is no outsmarting the genius of dreams.

It is certainly a great fact/truth that the ability of thought to describe or reconfigure sensory experience is ultimately dependent upon the extent to which thought is similar to sensory experience. It occurs to me that dreams make thought more like sensory experience in general, thereby improving upon memory and understanding. Thoughts are invisible. The space in dreams is visible and invisible in fundamental equilibrium and balance, thereby making sensory experience maximally consistent with/similar to thought. This improves upon memory and understanding. There is no outsmarting the genius of dreams.

Dreams balance being and experience. Dream experience is possible/potential and actual in balance. Dreams balance conscious and unconscious experience.

Source Link

Do dreams improve upon memory and understanding by making the sensory experience MORE LIKE thought?

It is certainly a great fact/truth that the ability of thought to describe or reconfigure sensory experience is ultimately dependent upon the extent to which thought is similar to sensory experience. It occurs to me that dreams make thought more like sensory experience in general, thereby improving upon memory and understanding. Thoughts are invisible. The space in dreams is visible and invisible in fundamental equilibrium and balance, thereby making sensory experience maximally consistent with/similar to thought. This improves upon memory and understanding. There is no outsmarting the genius of dreams.