Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with pseudoscience
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 32458
This tag is to be used when questioning the scientific validity or (pseudo)scientific status of a given theory. Where relevant, the theory tag such as [freud], [psychoanalysis] etc. should be used alongside this tag for complete coverage.
2
votes
Accepted
Are there valid scientific bases for psychologist Taibi Kahler's Process Communication Model?
I did not find any article validating the process com on google scholar. Psychologists don't have access to the underlying design of the test. there is no research about it.
What I found is that the …
- 36