0
$\begingroup$

People generally resist change, yet they have a desire for diversification.
Of course, both is possible. Just like the need of safety but the desire for new discoveries and adventures.

But what is the psychological explaination? Is there anything I misunderstood?

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'm not really clear what the question is here, even if we take what you've proposed as a given (resistance to change/desire for diversification; a bit unclear without defining your terms) you've already said both are possible, yet they seem to be in opposition, but contradiction is completely normal in behavior, it needs no special explanation from psychology. $\endgroup$
    – Bryan Krause ♦
    Commented Oct 25, 2018 at 18:50
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Could you cite where you learned about each of these two seemingly contradictory statements? $\endgroup$
    – Steven Jeuris ♦
    Commented Oct 25, 2018 at 19:15
  • $\begingroup$ Welcome to Psychology.SE. We work differently to most SE sites, where we have a strict policy that all questions should show evidence of prior research. Please help us to help you and edit your question to provide more information on what you have read on this subject, what made you ask this question, and any problems you are having understanding your research. If you found nothing, what did you Google? This helps to provide an answer which will be more helpful. If you still have trouble with this, please visit the How to Ask page or Psychology & Neuroscience Meta. $\endgroup$
    – Chris Rogers
    Commented Oct 28, 2018 at 9:22

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
2
$\begingroup$

Balancing a combination of 'sticking with what you know' and 'exploring new things' is optimal in a lot of environments. What the optimal balance is depends on a bunch of factors like your planning horizon, the distribution of good things in the world (common/rare & similar/dissimilar), and how you interact with them (reusable, like a shortcut, depleting, like a gold mine, or one-shot interaction like buying a house).

People are really surprisingly good at this! Fun search terms for google scholar might be "explore/exploit tradeoff" or "multi-arm bandit problems" [with humans]. But it's a big and complicated literature, actually I'd recommend starting with a popsci version, "Algorithms to live by" by Brian Christian and Tom Griffiths. I think you might enjoy it, it's a great book, very readable, and it goes into some detail on this question and a few of its near neighbors.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Ok, I guess it's kinda cheating to suggest scholar search terms instead of specific articles! But the OP is so broad, I don't know whether to respond with restless bandits or reinforcement learning or what. Every combination of the different factors in that first paragraph is a different paradigm, really. For general background reading I can't think of a better option than that Christian & Griffiths book, it does a pretty good job of being interesting to the full audience range from researcher to casual interest. $\endgroup$
    – steveLangsford
    Commented Oct 29, 2018 at 15:38
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I actually upvoted this question after seeing there was a reference in the body text. I'll remove my comment. $\endgroup$
    – AliceD ♦
    Commented Oct 29, 2018 at 20:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.