Return to Answer

In TA, the concept is that interactions – transactions – between different people in a given situation when communicating with each other, can be different and changing; and using TA you can analyse these transactions to give you and insight into what is happening. The philosophy behind TA is that

1. People are ‘OK’ – We may not like or agree with other’s behaviour, but we can accept them as worthy individuals.
2. People can think for themselves and it is there responsibility to do so.
3. People make decisions that decide their destiny and these decisions can change.

This triangle, developed by Stephen Karpman (1968), is actually to do with co-dependency which can be formed by well intentioned laypeople and trained therapists who are not bearing on mind some of the pitfalls that can come from therapy work.

If you think upon what Dr Eric Berne said, as quoted above, ethical therapy is about helping people to work out for themselves, what they are going to do, to help themselves through their issues. Neither the person going through therapy, or the therapist, should become dependent on the other person.

Reviewing the concept, David Emerald (2016) suggests that the Drama Triangle is problematic, calling it the DDT (Dreaded Drama Triangle), whereby “fixing and saving others, a rescuer believes others will appreciate and value them for their good deeds” and this can lead to problems because

In TA, the concept is that interactions – transactions – between different people in a given situation when communicating with each other, can be different and changing; and using TA you can analyse these transactions to give you an insight into what is happening. The philosophy behind TA is that

1. People are ‘OK’ – We may not like or agree with other’s behaviour, but we can accept them as worthy individuals.
2. People can think for themselves and it is their responsibility to do so.
3. People make decisions that decide their destiny, and these decisions can change.

This triangle, developed by Stephen Karpman (1968), is actually to do with co-dependency, which can be formed by well intentioned laypeople and trained therapists who are not bearing in mind some of the pitfalls that can come from therapy work.

If you think upon what Dr Eric Berne said, as quoted above, ethical therapy is about helping people to work out for themselves, what they are going to do, to help themselves through their issues. Neither the person going through therapy, or the therapist, should become dependent on the other person.

Reviewing the concept, David Emerald (2016) suggests that the Drama Triangle is problematic, calling it the DDT (Dreaded Drama Triangle), whereby “fixing and saving others, a rescuer believes others will appreciate and value them for their good deeds” and this can lead to problems, because

Changing Karpman's triangle, in the TED triangle, the victim is a Creator (taking responsibility and focusing on what they want to create). There is a Challenger (opposite of persecutor – provoking learning and growth with benevolent intent) and there is the Coach who is supporting the creator in their efforts by asking powerful questions (Emerald, 2017).

Motives can vary from person to person, and so the answer would be subject to opinion. Your assumption that the motivation of a rescuer type isn't really to help someone, but feed your own ego, can be flawed. A rescuer can genuinely want to help a friend or work colleague to deal with a particular difficult situation. It is just that Stephen Karpman suggests that while the rescuer is looking to help, they ought to ask themselves:

Changing Karpman's triangle, in the TED triangle, the victim is a Creator (taking responsibility and focusing on what they want to create). There is a Challenger (opposite of persecutor – provoking learning and growth with benevolent intent) and there is the Coach who is supporting the creator in their efforts by asking powerful questions (Emerald, 2017).

Motives can vary from person to person, and so the answer would be subject to opinion. Your assumption that the motivation of a rescuer type isn't really to help someone, but feed your own ego, can be flawed. A rescuer can genuinely want to help a friend or work colleague to deal with a particular difficult situation (pure altruism — selfless concern for the well-being of others). It is just that Stephen Karpman suggests that while the rescuer is looking to help, they ought to ask themselves:

Reviewing the concept, David Emerald (2016) suggests that the Drama Triangle is problematic, calling it the DDT (Dreaded Drama Triangle), whereby “fixing and saving others, a rescuer believes others will appreciate and value them for their good deeds” and this can lead to problems because • the rescuer has a feeling of powerlessness once the problem has been solved, and then goes looking for more victims to save; plus • if they don’t get the appreciation they feel they deserve, they can then go into victim mode.

Reviewing the concept, David Emerald (2016) suggests that the Drama Triangle is problematic, calling it the DDT (Dreaded Drama Triangle), whereby “fixing and saving others, a rescuer believes others will appreciate and value them for their good deeds” and this can lead to problems because

• the rescuer has a feeling of powerlessness once the problem has been solved, and then goes looking for more victims to save; plus
• if they don’t get the appreciation they feel they deserve, they can then go into victim mode.