Timeline for Non-binary scores for backward digit span (BDS)
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2023 at 18:03 | history | edited | Rodrigo de Azevedo | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Minor improvement
|
| S Jun 18, 2021 at 23:02 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Jun 18, 2021 at 23:02 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| S Jun 10, 2021 at 21:24 | history | bounty started | Rodrigo de Azevedo | ||
| S Jun 10, 2021 at 21:24 | history | notice added | Rodrigo de Azevedo | Authoritative reference needed | |
| Jun 9, 2021 at 13:35 | comment | added | Rodrigo de Azevedo | @ArnonWeinberg Thank you for your comment. If I know very little about psychometrics, I know even less about its history. I assume that some of these tests were developed when computers were much more expensive and much, much slower. Given that computing is now relatively cheap, I am interested in gathering as much data as possible, as discarding data is much easier than acquiring it. | |
| Jun 9, 2021 at 3:01 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPsychology/status/1402460746689224709 | ||
| Jun 8, 2021 at 20:01 | comment | added | Arnon Weinberg♦ | As I recall when I administered this test, subjects were given 2 chances at each length, and failing both not only scores 0, but also stops the test. With a partial score, you would also need to decide stopping criteria that can be determined on the fly by the administrator. The current method has the advantage of being very simple to administer and score. | |
| Jun 8, 2021 at 19:59 | history | edited | Rodrigo de Azevedo | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Jun 8, 2021 at 19:57 | review | First posts | |||
| Jun 8, 2021 at 23:12 | |||||
| Jun 8, 2021 at 19:53 | history | asked | Rodrigo de Azevedo | CC BY-SA 4.0 |