Skip to main content

Timeline for Nature vs. Nurture

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 13, 2021 at 11:50 comment added Starckman If "shared-environment" is defined as "if an environment has the effect of making siblings more similar, it is defined as a shared environment", why then does it come as a surprise that 0% of the personality traits variance come from shared environment?
Sep 29, 2018 at 15:37 vote accept Borbei
Sep 28, 2018 at 14:27 comment added steveLangsford One side note: the degree of heritability is itself a function of environment. The classic example is height: in times of plenty, 100% of variability in height is inherited, in times of famine, almost 0% is. Heritability is not a property of the trait alone.
Sep 28, 2018 at 14:19 comment added rus9384 @Borbei, parents are nurture, but if under different nurture there is a similarity between either twins or even non-twin siblings, it is reasonable to think it's an effect of nature. Or vice versa, when nurture is the same, and there is a similarity between non-related people, it is more likely to be an effect of nurture. But that all works only for larger selections. Two persons are not enough, for sure.
Sep 27, 2018 at 21:37 history edited got trolled too much this week CC BY-SA 4.0
added 1474 characters in body
Sep 27, 2018 at 21:32 history edited got trolled too much this week CC BY-SA 4.0
added 1474 characters in body
Sep 27, 2018 at 21:32 comment added Borbei Thanks! That's interesting. So would it be fair to summarize what is known on nature vs. nurture by "the only effect of the environment is in making siblings more different; basically never more similar"? Parents contribute only noise, without any signal? :)
Sep 27, 2018 at 21:25 history edited got trolled too much this week CC BY-SA 4.0
added 1474 characters in body
Sep 27, 2018 at 21:19 history answered got trolled too much this week CC BY-SA 4.0