Timeline for Connection between sociosexual orientation and parental instincts?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2018 at 23:52 | comment | added | rus9384 | What I found more interesting is table 3, which actually seems to support your claim. However, 19 year olds, hmmm. Not sure by that time people already can have enough long-term relationships. Probably could subjective value kick in, some people might consider 2-weeks-relationship short and some could consider them long. | |
| Sep 19, 2018 at 23:31 | comment | added | rus9384 | "The Parenting Effort Scale had less predictive power overall, although it explained unique variance across several constructs and was the only unique predictor of the number of long-term (serious and committed) relationships." It still makes sense to say that people with greater parenting effort are willing to prefer long term relationships. But we don't know about causal relationships... But would be great to know, because it would tell me if my anthropologic theory has predictive power. | |
| Sep 19, 2018 at 20:01 | comment | added | got trolled too much this week | @rus9384: those are not exact substitutes (or opposites), so be careful what you ask for. Being willing to take side-partners is not the same as not being willing to have a long-term partner. There's a reason why I included the whole table... Also, the correlation with STMO is weak and would not survive a [significance] correction for multiple comparisons. | |
| Sep 19, 2018 at 19:59 | comment | added | rus9384 | Hm, SOI-R-B is about behaviour. Regarding attitudes I think the picture would be different, given there is positive relationship between parenting effort and LTMO and negative (but unsignificant) between parenting effort and STMO. | |
| Sep 19, 2018 at 19:51 | history | answered | got trolled too much this week | CC BY-SA 4.0 |