Timeline for Is the Myer Briggs Type indicator (MBTI) a reasonable scientific theory?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2017 at 23:50 | comment | added | Doc_Dormicum | @mfloren - I am sorry, I just now saw this. The focus, because it's the "main selling point" of the MTBI for some reason. Its proponents go so far as to call Mayers a "student of Jung", which is about as accurate as calling me a student of Ekman's or Dickson, because I've read their books. Saunders, F. W. Katherine and Isabel discuss this at length. | |
| Nov 27, 2017 at 13:08 | comment | added | Duvrai | This is a curiously unscientific way of saying that it is not a reasonable scientific theory. | |
| Oct 11, 2017 at 7:22 | comment | added | mflo-ByeSE | Much appreciated! If I may, which of these focuses on the lack of relationship to Carl Jung's work? | |
| Oct 11, 2017 at 6:51 | history | edited | Doc_Dormicum | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added references
|
| Oct 11, 2017 at 6:47 | comment | added | Doc_Dormicum | @mfloren: happily. Added. | |
| Oct 9, 2017 at 20:23 | comment | added | mflo-ByeSE | There is much claimed in this answer. Do you have any references to support your claims? | |
| Oct 9, 2017 at 19:34 | review | Late answers | |||
| Oct 9, 2017 at 20:24 | |||||
| Oct 9, 2017 at 19:22 | review | First posts | |||
| Oct 9, 2017 at 20:24 | |||||
| Oct 9, 2017 at 19:18 | history | answered | Doc_Dormicum | CC BY-SA 3.0 |