Timeline for Performance of a group solving a cognitive task: How does it scale?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Jan 23, 2012 at 15:27 | history | suggested | David | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
I could not help myself, but to remove the indivation that good trivia players are smart.
|
| Jan 23, 2012 at 14:14 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 23, 2012 at 15:27 | |||||
| Jan 23, 2012 at 13:11 | comment | added | Piotr Migdal | @JeromyAnglim: I am interested in collaboration on cognitive tasks, so only the part on software development is answering my question. I am aware of Ringelmann effect (however, it's more about motivation/management than anything else). And yes, for different tasks the scaling is likely to be different. | |
| Jan 23, 2012 at 11:35 | comment | added | Kris | Thank you for the very useful info. I hope the OP finds this useful, too, in which case you could include it in the answer. I would wait know how each of the four are influenced. | |
| Jan 23, 2012 at 11:33 | comment | added | Jeromy Anglim | @Kris but these are just some basic thoughts; I'm sure the question could be answered in many different ways; I'm keen to see what others have to say | |
| Jan 23, 2012 at 11:31 | comment | added | Jeromy Anglim | If I understand your question then for the four dot points above the scaling would be: a. almost linear; b. increasing but possibly with an inverted u quadratic; c. monotonically increasing and monotonically decelerating; d. increasing or decreasing. | |
| Jan 23, 2012 at 11:21 | comment | added | Kris | The OP, however, is only interested in up-scaling the model. How do any of these factors influence the ease or level of difficulty in scaling up? | |
| Jan 23, 2012 at 6:51 | history | answered | Jeromy Anglim | CC BY-SA 3.0 |