The F ratio statistic has a numerator and denominator degrees of freedom. Thus, you report:
F (numerator_df, denominator_df) = F_value, p = ..., effect size = ...
The numerator degrees of freedom relates to the factor of interest; the denominator degrees of freedom corresponds to the degrees of freedom for the error variance.
The exact way that these ...
The numbers inside the parentheses are the degrees of freedom for the F-statistic.
The second number is the within-group degrees of freedom. When you have the same number of subjects in all conditions, then the second number will be the number of subjects - the number of cells (conditions) in your design.
After asking my question, I did a quick search and found one promising journal that will commence in 2014 called Scientific Data.
Scientific Data is a new open-access, online-only publication for
descriptions of scientifically valuable datasets. It introduces a new
type of content called the Data Descriptor, which will combine
General reporting recommendations such as that of APA Manual apply. One should report exact p-value and an effect size along with its confidence interval. In the case of likelihood ratio test one should report the test's p-value and how much more likely the data is under model A than under model B.
Example: The data is 7.3, 95% CI [6.8,8.1] times more ...
Nature Neuroscience offers such a possibility.
Does anyone know of any clinical psychology journals that use a double-blind review process?
Due to fact, that I can´t give a comment, I will post an answer, that is not sufficient. However, I hope this might give you little more insight. Furthermore, my knowledge mainly builds on german IQ Tests.
1.) Usually this is done by the institution/person etc., that has developed the IQ test. However, in some cases the parameters aren´t updated. So, you ...
To touch on your broader question, as I understand getting full text publications in conferences are highly respected in computer science. In psychology and neuroscience (note I don't know so much about computational neuroscience), publishing papers in high impact journals is more respected in the field. While some conferences do have full-length papers, ...
I get the impression that good journal editors will get at least one reviewer who is skilled in the methodology used in the paper. The importance of this reviewer role would presumably vary with the statistical or other methodological complexity of the paper.
That said, reviewing is well known to be imperfect particularly when it comes to checking all the ...
Unfortunately, I'm not sure there's a quick answer to the exact amount of overlap, but you may be able to get an estimate by comparing the list of journals included in Medline (http://www.nlm.nih.gov/archive/20130415/tsd/serials/lji.html.notice.html) to the list of journals covered by PsycINFO (http://www.apa.org/pubs/databases/psycinfo/coverage.aspx). Also, ...
There are several MedLine search engines, some of them requiring an (academic) account. You may want to use
ISI Web of Knowledge - http://isiknowledge.com/medline,
EbscoHost - http://search.ebscohost.com/login.asp?profile=web&defaultdb=cmedm,
ProQuest - http://search.proquest.com/medline/advanced
Ovid - http://gateway.ovid.com/autologin.html
This question may be better directed to academia.se.
In the first instance, you should check the editorial requirements of the journal you are targeting. Most journals prescribe that it is mandatory to spell out acronyms with first usage. It is possible that some very specific technical journals will allow common terminology through without being specific.
I've been involved in norming the German version of the WAIS-IV in 2012. The procedure for norming a psychological test is always the same:
A representative sample of the whole population is drawn.
What differs between tests is how the sample is drawn. For the WAIS-IV, equal numbers of persons where recruited for each age group (in, I believe, 5 year ...
The likelihood ratio test is distributed as χ²with degrees of freedom = the change in degrees of freedom between the two models. So, to give an example dropping one parameter from a model, you would report it like this:
χ² (1) = 3.4, p = 0.065
I do not know of any computational neuroscience conference with proceedings that is always held in Europe.
Neural information processing systems (NIPS) was held in Europe only once recently, but back in US. (it was in Spain on 2011)
International joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN) has minor section on computational neuroscience but it's mostly held ...