7
$\begingroup$

I have an experiment with 500 students who where asked to solve a general problem.

Each student had the assignment to find as many solutions as possible to the problem in 15 minutes. Solutions where submitted in the form of mind maps (where each node represents a possible solution and connections between nodes are also possible). 500 maps are available for evaluation. All the students were previously trained about the use of mind maps.

The objective would be to get a reliable proxy of each student creativity from their outputs. I'm not sure if this is possible or if the approach is just wrong and one should use a more accepted test to measure creativity. No other test scores are available for this sample.

We are thinking about different approaches such as:

  • counting the number of generated ideas;
  • using experts to evaluate the characteristics of the creative outputs.

Is there any paper related to the issue? Or any accepted method that could be used to evaluate creativty of the students?

$\endgroup$

migrated from stats.stackexchange.com Apr 30 '15 at 11:19

This question came from our site for people interested in statistics, machine learning, data analysis, data mining, and data visualization.

8
$\begingroup$

You are not far off from one of the classic tests of creativity! The Torrance Test of Creative Thinking scores for fluency (number of responses) as well as originality (statistical rarity of responses) and elaboration (level of detail) on a variety of different tasks--some of which are similar to your mind-mapping task. The validity of the TTCT has been examined with several long-term studies, so there is a fair amount of data on its measurements as well as the form of the test itself.

Torrance, E. P. (1981b). Empirical validation of criterion-referenced indicators of creative ability through a longitudinal study. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 6, 136-140.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks a lot Krysta! Do you suggest evaluating the mind maps in the same way and claiming this is valid because the TTCT is valid? Because I'm not sure this would be accepted, since has not been validated yet. $\endgroup$ – Forinstance Apr 30 '15 at 15:01
  • $\begingroup$ No, I wouldn't claim that it's valid because the TTCT is valid--it's been validated, and your procedures haven't. What arena is this research in, and what is your hypothesis? $\endgroup$ – Krysta Apr 30 '15 at 15:44
  • $\begingroup$ I'm dealing with evolution of social interactions and creativity is just one among the many variables. But is an important one. So I'm looking for an acceptable way to include it in the study starting from the tests we have.. $\endgroup$ – Forinstance May 1 '15 at 13:13

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.