0
$\begingroup$

I live in Finland where it is not acceptable to emphasize of being rich, eg. buying expensive sportcars/houses/apartments and introduce them on "yellow press".

But there is one exception. If you have earned your money doing sports (eg. playing ice hockey, driving Formula One) it seems to be totally acceptable.

What is the psychology behind this?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ This is really more a cultural anthropology question than a cognitive question, I think. $\endgroup$ – Krysta Nov 13 '14 at 12:43
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Common sense answer: because people can see how sports people earn their riches by actually being better than others, while it is totally incomprehensible to the common person how managers can earn obscene amounts of money for ruining companies, ruining the lives of the discharged employees, systematically evading taxes and thus damaging the state and the community, producing the lowest quality that they can get away with, and so on. A sports person does an honest job that everyone can understand and relate to, while the capitalist business person manipulates people for profit. $\endgroup$ – user3116 Nov 13 '14 at 12:58
  • $\begingroup$ +1 common sense answer. Counterargument would be that in sports it's also possible to use doping. $\endgroup$ – CuriousSuperhero Nov 14 '14 at 10:22
  • $\begingroup$ I'd rather say that there's quite a bunch of managers around the sports (especially in the team games) lots of commercial merchandise produced to be bought without other purpose and in some team sports there's also a big fan-hate push thing. That being said, this question doesn't apply to me as I think both kinds of money are equally dirty. $\endgroup$ – Tomáš Zato - Reinstate Monica Nov 24 '14 at 21:48
1
$\begingroup$

It's all about what people think are your motives for what you do, how hard people think you work for your money, and how nice people think you are.

If people think you earn money just because you love money, you can easily come off as cold and less pro-social. That makes people skeptical of you.

A bias makes people tend to think that whatever work they don't see you do, you never did (personal experience). This makes people value you less and admire you less if they can't actually see your contributions to society. Most office-work is prone to this bias.

People tend to see social people as more nice than less social people, and like them more. This is likely due to the advantage our race gains from social cooperation, which we would not have survived without. We prefer people who we think we can cooperate with and get well along with.

Talking about getting well along, we also prefer people with whom we share any interest, hobby, attitude, history etc because it increases the chance we get well along with them. Birds of a feather flock together. This means that 1) We prefer people we know are social and 2) we prefer people who share some of our interests.

Business people will go well along with their kind. They might not be very fond of athletes. Athletes go well along with their kind. They might not be very fond of business people.

Fact is, that which of these "professions" is more popular depends entirely on who you ask and the circumstances. So I take it you wonder why the general attitude is that business people are less popular than athletes. Well, that's because most people feel they have more in common with athletes (who share their passion for sports) than business people.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.