I've opened a question trying to point out every doubt I had on a language of development: I thought it could be constructive.
I'm pretty proud of the formulation of this question since it gives almost nothing as understood. While I was studying math at university many books were giving many concept as known.
Another guy simply answered in a constructive way.
I think that this cognitive error is pretty diffuse. How is it called? Is it an attribution error? Can it be motivated by the need for feeding self-esteem while putting no effort in making something constructive?