1
$\begingroup$

I'm trying to find a paper that states otherwise -- that we can't have all neurons fire simultaneously, but all I can find is Quora questions (like this) which mentions that if all neurons will fire together we will have a seizure.

$\endgroup$
5
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What does "simultaneously" mean? What's the purpose of the question/what will it help you accomplish or understand? $\endgroup$
    – Bryan Krause
    Dec 19, 2022 at 5:22
  • $\begingroup$ "simultaneously" means at the same time. I assume that all neurons are being used in general at some point, but my question is, can there be a given time when they are all active at the same time. The link I shared from Quora states that there isn't such time, as this will result in a seizure. I'm trying to find a publishable paper that states the same (or the opposite). $\endgroup$
    – Penguin
    Dec 19, 2022 at 5:35
  • $\begingroup$ But why does it matter if they can or not? In principle, nothing prevents it, but also it would just never happen, so I don't see any purpose in asking the question. $\endgroup$
    – Bryan Krause
    Dec 19, 2022 at 5:54
  • $\begingroup$ If they don't it raises some interesting ideas from a computational side. I'm writing a paper and need to ensure that the ideas are based on a real phenomena (and not an assumption). But I do understand your reasoning and appreciate the help on this! $\endgroup$
    – Penguin
    Dec 19, 2022 at 6:00
  • $\begingroup$ Why does it raise interesting ideas from a computational side? Imagine, if neurons are firing at 100Hz (very fast, unusually fast for neurons, but it'll help us get to simultaneity), and you consider firing within a 1 ms window to be simultaneous (which isn't actually simultaneous, which is why I asked "what does simultaneously mean?"), the chance of all N neurons firing at the same time is equal to 1/0.1^N - you'll see that once you have a few neurons, this chance is very small, let alone 10s of billions. Nothing interesting there, just simple probability. $\endgroup$
    – Bryan Krause
    Dec 19, 2022 at 14:48

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

Note: this answer is imprecise; read its comments below.

"...based on the Hodgkin–Huxley model calculates by the method of ion counting and power integration that an action potential consumes 2.468 × 10−7 J of biological energy produced by the hydrolysis of Adenosine triphosphate (ATP)..." (ref. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11571-018-9503-3)

Supposing we have 100 billion neurons in the brain, the total energy consumed would be:

1E11 * 2.468E-7 J = 2.468E4 J

So 24KJ to generate a single action potential for each neuron of the brain.

To lift an apple 1 meter requires roughly 1 J. So the energy needed to make each single neuron fire once would be enough to lift 24 thousand apples 1 meter, all at the same time.

So that is why it is impossible: the brain would catch fire. An we would starve.

$\endgroup$
4
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Few things wrong with this answer... First of all, action potentials are almost entirely passive. They are powered by pre-existing electrical gradients; yes, it takes energy to maintain those gradients over the long run, but this maintenance occurs over seconds to minutes; the precise timing of a spike doesn't matter. Further, all neurons of the brain are spiking all the time, some might be as slow as 1 Hz but others as fast as 100 Hz. There's no additional energy expenditure for every neuron of the brain to fire at once within, say, a second, versus firing at once within, say, 1 ms. $\endgroup$
    – Bryan Krause
    Dec 21, 2022 at 16:06
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Lastly, the HH model is based on the giant squid; humans don't have giant squid neurons, we have human neurons, and mammalian neurons have some very important modifications like voltage-gated potassium channels that greatly minimize the metabolic costs of single action potentials by limiting the counter-currents during the rising phase of the action potential. $\endgroup$
    – Bryan Krause
    Dec 21, 2022 at 16:07
  • $\begingroup$ @BryanKrause - Thank you for your constructive comments, and I would like to read a correct answer from you. From what you wrote, each neuron still needs/dissipates some amount of energy when firing (either during the spike process of before that). How much is that? $\endgroup$
    – Pietro
    Dec 21, 2022 at 16:46
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ This paper ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4189373 references another that estimates 0.66 J released per minute per gram of brain tissue. Most metabolic activity in the brain is synaptic currents rather than action potentials - action potentials are inexpensive energetically: what's metabolically expensive is when lots of ions move across membranes. Very few ions need to move for an AP; lots of ions move when you have competing excitatory and inhibitory conductances. I don't know what the ratio is or what you'd estimate a single spike to cost, though. $\endgroup$
    – Bryan Krause
    Dec 21, 2022 at 16:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.