Is the Sagan standard, which says that "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence", a kind of proportionality bias?

Since the proportionality bias is a tendency to believe that causes are proportional to effects in magnitude, so the Sagan standard seem to fall into that category. Maybe if the standard was a little more specific or it actually defined what it means by extraordinay, then maybe it wouldn't be.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.