2
$\begingroup$

In the way orientation columns display selectivity for various edge orientations projected on the retina which is then repeated at various angles in a localised region of the cortex. I am wondering whether in an analogous fashion if any similar neuronal circuitry has been shown to represent variations in the surface slant at the region being projected onto the retina.

By slant I mean a measure of the surfaces orientation away from co-planar with the visual focal plane.

Perhaps this information is extracted from binocular receptive fields?

If it hasn't been found then I guess I'm also wondering if anyone has ever looked? and or how the depth information from binocular receptive fields is encoded/represented for further processing?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Welcome. What do you mean by '... surface normal at the image source ...'? $\endgroup$ – AliceD Jan 5 at 20:05
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, sorry - graphics terminology. what I was getting at is the angle of the surface at that point with respect to the image plane... if that's any clearer $\endgroup$ – norlesh Jan 5 at 20:16
  • $\begingroup$ I edited the question somewhat. Last thing is: ...the angle of the surface at that point... Which point? The very best thing to do is to provide an image to illustrate what you mean. It can say more than a 1,000 words. $\endgroup$ – AliceD Jan 5 at 20:27
  • $\begingroup$ ah so the 'surface normal' is projected out from a point on the object ... so I think it translates to : the point on the image source where the stimuli of the retinas receptive field originates from. Oh and thanks $\endgroup$ – norlesh Jan 5 at 20:34
2
$\begingroup$

Yes there is evidence of the encoding of surface slant in the visual field

  • Disparity-Based Coding of Three-Dimensional Surface Orientation by Macaque Middle Temporal Neurons

    We now show that MT contains robust, disparity-based signals regarding the 3-D orientation (tilt and slant) of planar surfaces. This tilt selectivity does not result from vergence eye movements or subtle monocular dot-density cues, and approximately one-half of MT neurons respond more strongly to a tilted stimulus (i.e., a nonzero slant) than to any frontoparallel stimulus of the same size (data not shown). In addition, we show that the tilt preference of MT neurons is primarily independent of the mean depth and slant of the surface, properties that may simplify the extraction of 3-D orientation signals from a population of MT neurons.

  • Representation of 3-D surface orientation by velocity and disparity gradient cues in area MT

    This study demonstrates that single MT neurons signal 3-D surface orientation (tilt and slant) via selectivity for velocity and disparity gradients, and to a lesser degree, for texture gradients. Selectivity is similar in multiunit activity recorded simultaneously, suggesting that 3-D surface orientation tuning is clustered in MT. Tilt selectivity is generally enhanced when multiple gradient cues are presented together, indicating that MT may integrate cues to represent surface structure with greater fidelity. This occurs despite the fact that tilt preferences for disparity and velocity gradients are poorly correlated overall. In addition, we found that responses to the combined stimulus, which contains all three gradient cues, are well approximated by a linear weighted sum of responses to the individual cues, with disparity and velocity gradients weighted most heavily. This study provides the first systematic examination of neural integration of multiple gradient cues to surface orientation and suggests that area MT contains an early multicue representation of 3-D surface structure.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.