I've seen all those checklists of psychopathy traits, read many articles and watched several tutorials - they mention like dozens of characteristics, but never make it clear about the actual meaning of the word.

Is psychopathy the lack of emotion? Is it the lack of empathy? What's the most accurate definition of the term?

Also, a lot of things that I've seen are unclear and contradictory:

  1. A lot of explanations mention "disregard to social norms" as an intrinsic trait - but it clearly contradicts the trait of "self-interest", because by committing crimes or disregarding norms they harm themselves just as much as they harm people around. That's exactly what some psychopaths respond to allegations that they are dangerous and may commit a crime: "there's absolutely no reason or benefit of committing crime, so why would I do it?"
  2. A lot of explanations mention "superficial charm", while it's unclear how do you even measure that objectively and what does it have to do with mental disorders? Is the evaluating therapist just supposed to tick "yes" next to "superficial charm" if they personally were charmed by a psychopath, or what? And what does it even have to do with mental health: it's not like "charm" is an aura directly projected by brain.
  3. It's very unclear about impulsiveness, aggressiveness and impulsivity: some mention them as intrinsic traits of psychopathy, while others claim that they have nothing to do with it. It's also unclear how do they fit together with lack of emotional response or self interest, because they have nothing to do with each other or even contradict each other.
  4. Things like "manipulation", "lack of realistic goals" or "disregard to safety" seem like things that 90% of the population would qualify for, at least at some point. What exactly is so special about "psychopathic" disregard for safety that makes it stand out from the disregard rutinely demostrated by every chemistry freshman? Is it like they are incapable of understanding the very concept of safety, or what? Are they not only remorseless and aggressive, but also intellectually retarded? Does there exist a negative thing that psychopaths aren't?

In short, to the question of what psychopathy means, everyone says entirely different things, most of which either don't make sense or are self-contradictory. It seems like a blanket term for everything that's considered "evil" by society, but doesn't seem like a real mental disorder. Is it even one disorder, or a collective name for several unrelated disorders?

The only thing that I am clear about is that psychopathy is innate (in comparison to sociopathy, which is trauma-induced).

P.S. I have scientific background, but I am not a psychologist - so it's possible that everything in psychology is as "vague", and I just don't understand how does this area of science works (although, for example, bipolar disorder was clear enough to me).

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Possible duplicate of What is the difference between a psychopath and sociopath? $\endgroup$ – Chris Rogers Oct 30 '18 at 0:18
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @ChrisRogers, thanks for the link, but not a duplicate. I generally understand how sociopathy is different from psychopathy, but it doesn't make psychopathy less confusing or more unambiguously defined across the Internet. Strangely, the definitions are more clear about how the two disorders compare to each other than about their absolute meaning. $\endgroup$ – A.V. Arno Oct 30 '18 at 1:07

First of all, you need to delineate between two usages of the term "psychopathic". The popular one is as you defined, more or less. The clinical one can be found in the DSM of psychiatry. It should include the following criteria:

  • inability to empathize with others and
  • lack of remorse when their actions hurt someone else.
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. That's what I thought it is... P.S. Is there any source that mentions this specific definition? Because I've looked through many papers, and all of them just list criteria (like dozens of them, including some of the "popular" ones) and never plain-straight state what psychopathy is. $\endgroup$ – A.V. Arno Oct 31 '18 at 20:06
  • $\begingroup$ I memory is reading it over a decade ago from a DSM website. I'm afraid I don't recall anymore and quick searches are showing them. These are really the best criteria. I find most attempts at defining it clinically to be ambiguous, narcissistic, and dangerous. The "funny" thing is, that most Americans are clinically psychopathic and have no thoughts whatsoever about their Presidents being serial killers. $\endgroup$ – TheDoctor Oct 31 '18 at 20:19

As the Wikipedia article on psychopathy makes clear, there are different definitions of psychpathy – and in fact there are different definitions of every scientific concept –, depending on which scholar you consult. This is not a problem, as every scientific publication will make clear which definition it uses.

The truth is that there is an ongoing discussion on what psychopathy is – and if it exists at all! It is no accident that both the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10), which is the international standard diagnostic tool for medical and psychiatric conditions, and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-5), which is the international standard diagnostic tool for psychological disorders, do not contain the diagnosis psychopathy.


I have also read a lot of definitions of psychopathy and I've never found them contradictory, quite the opposite.

You could take the oldest(?) one.

Psychopathy has been classically described as a severe personality disorder and a unitary construct associated with a variety of affective, behavioral and interpersonal impairments (Cleckley 1941).

Regarding this last part of your question

"It seems like a blanket term for everything that's considered "evil" by society, but doesn't seem like a real mental disorder."


Yes, they have lot of "evil" traits but some of them also have "non evil" traits. For instance:

leadership, logical thinking, composure, creativity, fearlessness, money smart, focus, extroversion and management; and could contribute to a positive adjustment within a set environment (The Durand adaptative psychopathic traits questionnaire: Development and validation, 2017)

The Block Quotes above are from this paper Adaptive psychopathic traits: Positive outcomes in a college student sample by Jonathan Bronchain, Henri Chabrol, Patrick Raynal

  • $\begingroup$ The oldest definition that you provide seems like the definition of any psychological disorder. Speaking of 'evil' traits, this list is often brought up as the "definition". If it doesn't qualify as an inconsistent heap of disconnected evil traits all lumped together, then I don't know what does. $\endgroup$ – A.V. Arno Jul 1 '20 at 11:01

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.