2
$\begingroup$

I've noticed that many people assume that consultants know more than they themselves do and/or more than their team does. That is, when a team is stuck on a problem, some people believe that a consultant can figure it out even without knowing that consultant. True, more heads might help, but I've also seen teams who believe everything a consultant says, especially at the beginning of the relationship yet scrutinize the people they work with. Why?

I've read about the halo effect in Wikipedia, which contains the statement, "The halo effect is a type of immediate judgement discrepancy, or cognitive bias, where a person making an initial assessment of another person, place, or thing will assume ambiguous information based upon concrete information."

This would suggest to me that any concrete information can bias someone when filling in the ambiguous information. However, reading more about the halo effect, it seems mainly focused on how people look.

So my questions are, what goes on in people's minds to create the belief that a consultant knows best when they don't have evidence to believe so? Is it a bias? If so, which one? Or just human behaviour? Something else? Does it depend on the situation?

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Who are the "many people"? Managers, team members, outside persons, or ??? All will have a different viewpoint. But if the team were more knowledgeable, then the consultant wouldn't be necessary, right? Anyway this seems to be more situational than psychological. $\endgroup$
    – user3169
    Jun 13, 2018 at 6:07
  • $\begingroup$ @user3169 - different situations can can have psychological effects so a phenomenon which is situational can also be psychological. $\endgroup$
    – Chris Rogers
    Jun 13, 2018 at 9:15
  • $\begingroup$ @user3169: I'm not referring to a specific personal experience but, rather, a trend I've noticed over 18+ years working in software. $\endgroup$
    – Marnie A.
    Jun 13, 2018 at 16:01

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
1
$\begingroup$

Yes, this could be a cognitive bias. Quite clearly, a consultant is expected to be more knowledgeable about the specific topic they were hired to consult on.

A consultant (from Latin: consultare "to deliberate") is a professional who provides expert advice.

Consultants are supposed to be experts in their field, and as a result they carry some authority. Therefore, authority bias comes to mind:

Authority bias is the tendency to attribute greater accuracy to the opinion of an authority figure (unrelated to its content) and be more influenced by that opinion.

The bolded addendum in between parentheses is important. As long as based on the content the consultant brings to the table you respect their opinion, there is no cognitive bias (no irrationality); they are simply doing a good job.

But, not all 'consultants' are experts per se. In software development specifically, I have the impression 'consultancy' has almost become synonymous with 'temporary hire'. Newly grads often get hired straight out of school in consultancy firms. In such cases, there might be a cognitive bias at play, when it is not the contributed content which is evaluated (as you outline in your answer), but merely the title the consultant carries.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ While I agree with your reasoning, the specific question "I've also seen teams who believe everything a consultant says, especially at the beginning of the relationship yet scrutinize the people they work with. Why?" doesn't give the people enough information to do a "rational" decision/belief of the consultant's competency. Thus I conclude in my answer that it is in fact a cognitive bias which leads them to believe that the consultant is an expert. $\endgroup$
    – Jeyy
    Jun 13, 2018 at 9:33
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ That's what I wrote in the final paragraph, no? "In such cases, there might be a cognitive bias at play, ... (as you outline in your answer), ..." I merely provided more context to clarify exactly when it is/isn't considered a cognitive bias. $\endgroup$
    – Steven Jeuris ♦
    Jun 13, 2018 at 9:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.