1
$\begingroup$

DSM-V defines compulsions (as part of OCD) and then adds a bunch of qualifications. I wonder if we can define compulsions in a more objective way. Compulsions are repetitive behavior/thoughts intended to reduce distress and/or prevent a potentially serious situation. In this way they are different from other repetitive behavior, for instance, in autistic disorders.

But this definition alone does not seem to be enough to distinguish compulsions from socially sanctioned and justified rituals and activities, be it praying for hours, working 16 hours a day, or whatever. In addition, when we talk about compulsive gambling, shopping, gaming, TV watching, studying, eating, whatever, about people feeling "compelled" to do things in a certain rather rigid and repetitive way, how are we defining compulsions? Is it about reduced wilfulness (as in addictive behavior)? Is it about how irrational the behavior is (though it's hard to decide logically how we should live our life, as even philosophers can differ on this point)? And so on.

Thanks.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

The fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) includes a new chapter on Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders to reflect the increasing evidence of these disorders’ relatedness to one another and distinction from other anxiety disorders, as well as to help clinicians better identify and treat individuals suffering from these disorders.

You are right that compulsions are

repetitive behavior/thoughts intended to reduce distress and/or prevent a potentially serious situation

and this definition can be used for compulsive behaviour which does not pose a problem.

In this chapter the DSM is talking about disorders which in turn means we are talking about unjustified or socially unacceptable behaviour.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I guess this is why some people feel that psychological disorders are not real or that they're not real in the way a physical illness is. It seems any behavior can be seen as compulsion if it causes a person distress and is repetitive. Just to give an example, let's say you are a romantic who is highly distressed because you are not with your soul mate. This leads to repetitive search for the soul mate. Which then makes you feel temporarily better. So this can be a compulsion. What is pathological then is as much a question of logic as is a question of societal norms for behavior. $\endgroup$ – Jlente Nov 12 '16 at 21:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.