2
$\begingroup$

Does the handwriting analysis of a person predict only his/her behavior or only his/her character or both?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ on what basis you want your answer $\endgroup$ – Amruth A Aug 3 '16 at 12:01
4
$\begingroup$

The professional term for hand-writing analysis seems to be "Graphology" and there is no clear evidence that it could be used to predict a person's behaviour or character. For a starting point see the wikipedia page, then there are this article in the New York Times from 1993 and this more recent article from BBC from 2005 for more casual explanations of the phenomenon.

For more scientific references there is this paper from 1983 and this one from 1987 that both fail to show significant results. Also this book chapter might give a good overview but I can only tell from the abstract and you would have to find it at a library or purchase it somehow.

References

  • Rafaeli, A., & Klimoski, R. J. (1983). Predicting sales success through handwriting analysis: An evaluation of the effects of training and handwriting sample content. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(2), 212.
  • Beyerstein, B. L. (2007). Graphology—a total write-off. Tall Tales about the Mind & Brain: Separating Fact from Fiction, 233-70.
  • Furnham, A., & Gunter, B. (1987). Graphology and personality: Another failure to validate graphological analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 8(3), 433-435.
$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Handwriting analysis can, arguably, provide information on personal qualities (Klimoski & Rafaeli, 1983). I.e., handwriting analysis may tell you something about the character of a person. In turn, character affects behavior.

Reference
- Klimoski & Rafaeli, Journal of Occupational Psychology (1983), 56(3): 191-202

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The first link is in my opinion not a reliable source and the reference does not support the claim that "handwriting analysis provides information on personal qualities". They actually find a lot of methodological weaknesses in former studies and conclude in their summary: "Many other examples of weaknesses of methodology have been cited throughout the paper. However, when researchers are more rigorous in these areas (e.g. Rafaeli & Klimoski, 1983) the results have not been supportive of the usefulness of inferences based on script. " $\endgroup$ – awakenting Aug 3 '16 at 13:20
  • $\begingroup$ @awakenting Do the words 'arguably' and 'may' in the answer not capture all of your critiques? $\endgroup$ – AliceD Aug 3 '16 at 14:00
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Oh, I have to apologize, I'm not a native speaker and though of "arguably" rather meaning something like "it can be argued that". But given that, I think that the state of research clearly rejects the hypothesis that hand-writing analysis could tell you anything about a person's behaviour or character and your answer does not deliver that message. When you say it "may tell you something about the character", where is the evidence for that? $\endgroup$ – awakenting Aug 3 '16 at 14:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.