3
$\begingroup$

I was recently trying to argue that the Democratic National Committee's efforts to undermine the Bernie Sanders campaign were probably ineffective, and that those who attempted to do so probably suffered from a specific cognitive bias. Namely, due to their presence in the "political operative" nexus, they tended to overestimate, in general, the impact that political operations have on elections, swaying public opinion, etc.

I wonder whether social scientists have observed that, in general, experts overestimate their ability to make an impact, because they put the system they belong to on a pedestal. Has such a cognitive bias ever been discussed in the literature? Is there a name for it?

| improve this question | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Hard to say in "literature" but certainly any discussion of "intellect" as a subject worthy of Historical Study is usually frowned upon as seldom do academics "make History." Never hurts to be smart but "intellectualism" is not usually equated with anything substantive or "proveable." In short the smart person is "always correct" fallacy. $\endgroup$ – Doctor Zhivago Jul 25 '16 at 4:35
1
$\begingroup$

This sounds like a mix of biases "due to the effectiveness of a search set", "the illusion of validity" and "biases of imaginability". See judgement under uncertainty [Science, New Series, Vol. 185, No. 4157. (Sep. 27, 1974), pp. 1124-1131.].

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Welcome to cogsci.SE! Including a citation or DOI would be helpful, since all the extra info would drop out of the answer if the link went dead. $\endgroup$ – Krysta Jul 25 '16 at 12:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.