0
$\begingroup$

Herff et. al. demonstrate in "Brain-to-text: decoding spoken phrases from phone representations in the brain" a brain-to-text system to map intracranial electrocorticographic recordings to text.

I've been looking for literature attempting to go the other direction, text-to-brain, but have not had much luck finding anything on Springer, Google Scholar, and related services.

For someone in the know, what's the current state of the text-to-brain problem?

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

We don't have a well tested or accepted model of how specific items are encoded in the cortex, so text to brain is still far off. However, it is possible to send information to the brain.

Ramirez et al. 2013. Creating a False Memory in the Hippocampus

This study (in mice) involved creating a false sense of fear associated with a particular context. This implanted information is much higher level than just text, but it is still information.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ i wouldn't really call that experiment "implanting" information. it's more like artificially reactivating a memory in a different context. $\endgroup$ – honi Jan 12 '16 at 22:50
  • $\begingroup$ it is creating an association that didn't exist before. A human equivalent would be implanting the knowledge that french fries taste good with mayo. $\endgroup$ – K A Jan 19 '16 at 0:44
1
$\begingroup$

pretty simple: through direct electromagnetic stimulation of photoreceptors in the retina in patterns corresponding to letter shapes, transduced through layers of processing there, passed through the optic nerve to the lgn of the thalamus and from there to visual cortex, eventually you get a complete neural representation of the text. alternatively, you could use direct stimulation of the chochlea via pressure waves in the ear canal transduced by the bones of the inner ear. the auditory cortex will then do most of the heavy lifting.

seriously, though, that paper's achievement was pretty limited: "With 10 words in the dictionary, 75% of all words are recognized correctly." That is just over 3 bits of information being conveyed. And that is after training the classifier.

Training the brain to classify direct inputs is at about the same level of a few bits. www.nature.com/articles/srep01319

see What research has been done on brain-to-brain interfaces?

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ "use direct stimulation of the chochlea via pressure waves in the ear canal ..." sure sounds like the simple act of speaking to the subject or playing a sound $\endgroup$ – dwkd Jan 7 '16 at 17:34
  • $\begingroup$ My background is in CS, but your approach sounds like you're piggybacking the "pathways" used by the eyes and ears, opposed to stimulating whatever areas of the brain are responsible for natural language understanding. Is that a fair assessment? $\endgroup$ – GEL Jan 7 '16 at 19:52
  • $\begingroup$ yeah it was a joke. the easiest way to get text-to-brain is by showing a person written words or by saying words out loud to someone. $\endgroup$ – honi Jan 7 '16 at 20:01
  • $\begingroup$ the serious answer is that we can't do text-to-brain or brain-to-text because we have next to no idea how the brain represents text. $\endgroup$ – honi Jan 7 '16 at 20:04
  • $\begingroup$ current state of the art in brain-computer interfaces is limited to a few bits of bandwidth no matter the modality of the information. $\endgroup$ – honi Jan 7 '16 at 20:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.