We are observing the behaviors (either through behavioral experiments or observing brain activation through neuroscience experiments) based on the GIVEN TASK to the participants and trying to understand the observed behavior characteristics.

I wonder (i) if there is any limitation in our ability to speculate through hypothesis and theory to understand whats happening in the brain, (ii) if there is any limitation in manipulate the third person to test the hypothesis (iii) Is there a pattern in our 'ability' to coming up with a hypothesis or theory in understand the brain. Like we tend to make analogies, extrapolations etc.


closed as unclear what you're asking by Josh de Leeuw, Arnon Weinberg, honi, Krysta, AliceD Jun 9 '15 at 0:30

Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • $\begingroup$ try explaining what you are asking better, because this question is very hard to understand. $\endgroup$ – honi Jun 8 '15 at 16:30
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I have edited the question. Hope it is better now. $\endgroup$ – Karthi prime Jun 10 '15 at 6:25