Skip to main content

Timeline for Why does clickbait use numbers?

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 24, 2016 at 14:06 answer added Berit Larsen timeline score: 4
Jun 10, 2014 at 11:36 comment added Sebastian Schmitz The number makes the user feel in control. He knows how much information he will get. The user knows that he can read 15 facts that xxx in less than 5 minutes (his procastination break).
Jun 10, 2014 at 8:10 history edited Jeromy Anglim
edited tags; edited tags
Jun 9, 2014 at 20:57 comment added Josh It's also a way to drive up ad-views, since the list is often spread out over several pages.
Jun 9, 2014 at 10:23 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackCogSci/status/475946304665706496
Jun 9, 2014 at 7:57 review First posts
Jun 9, 2014 at 12:38
Jun 9, 2014 at 7:50 history edited Nick Stauner
edited tags
Jun 9, 2014 at 7:48 comment added Nick Stauner It may also be an appealingly easy format to read. The fact that BuzzFeed/Cracked.com/etc.-style lists are catchy surely isn't lost on the audience either. Arguably it also implies some depth to the topic that one wouldn't (/shouldn't) expect. I sure wouldn't be able to come up with that many sexy Star Wars tattoos off the top of my head...but have you ever noticed how inaccurate those numbers can be, or how often the articles are stuffed with ill-fitting content? I suspect there's some motive to inflate the numbers such as the implication of information richness.
Jun 9, 2014 at 7:46 comment added Anthony @blz Can you suggest a more appropriate tag? I'm really fumbling in the dark here.
Jun 9, 2014 at 7:44 comment added Louis Thibault I'm not sure the cognitive psychology tag is appropriate. I also suspect the numbers have more to do with the fact that the "x things every y should z" format is an easy format to write. In other words, I think the numbers have more to do with content creation more than link-baiting.
Jun 9, 2014 at 7:39 history asked Anthony CC BY-SA 3.0