Notice removed Draw attention by zergylord
Bounty Ended with marsei's answer chosen by zergylord
added image and clarification
Source Link
zergylord
  • 2.4k
  • 17
  • 33

The Two-Stream Hypothesis, where object properties are processed independently from spatial information, remains the most well established theory of visual processing. However, it concerns me that most models that reference this theory stop at the end of the two streams;streams (as per the cartoon model in the image below); they never say how the mind translates those sources of information into action (i.e. the two arrows in the picture never meet).

  • Are there models and/or theories out there that try and situate the Two Streams of information into a full perception action cycle?
  • And if not, then why not (e.g. complexity, better theories, different level of analysis, etc.)?

twoStreams

The Two-Stream Hypothesis, where object properties are processed independently from spatial information, remains the most well established theory of visual processing. However, it concerns me that most models that reference this theory stop at the end of the two streams; they never say how the mind translates those sources of information into action.

  • Are there models and/or theories out there that try and situate the Two Streams of information into a full perception action cycle?
  • And if not, then why not (e.g. complexity, better theories, different level of analysis, etc.)?

The Two-Stream Hypothesis, where object properties are processed independently from spatial information, remains the most well established theory of visual processing. However, it concerns me that most models that reference this theory stop at the end of the two streams (as per the cartoon model in the image below); they never say how the mind translates those sources of information into action (i.e. the two arrows in the picture never meet).

  • Are there models and/or theories out there that try and situate the Two Streams of information into a full perception action cycle?
  • And if not, then why not (e.g. complexity, better theories, different level of analysis, etc.)?

twoStreams

Notice added Draw attention by zergylord
Bounty Started worth 50 reputation by zergylord
Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackCogSci/status/361179523091410945
bolded questions
Source Link
Jeromy Anglim
  • 30.2k
  • 11
  • 86
  • 217

The Two-Stream HypothesisTwo-Stream Hypothesis, where object properties are processed independently from spatial information, remains the most well established theory of visual processing. However, it concerns me that most models that reference this theory stop at the end of the two streams; they never say how the mind translates those sources of information into action. Are there models and/or theories out there that try and situate the Two Streams of information into a full perception action cycle? And if not, then why not (e.g. complexity, better theories, different level of analysis, etc.)?

  • Are there models and/or theories out there that try and situate the Two Streams of information into a full perception action cycle?
  • And if not, then why not (e.g. complexity, better theories, different level of analysis, etc.)?

The Two-Stream Hypothesis, where object properties are processed independently from spatial information, remains the most well established theory of visual processing. However, it concerns me that most models that reference this theory stop at the end of the two streams; they never say how the mind translates those sources of information into action. Are there models and/or theories out there that try and situate the Two Streams of information into a full perception action cycle? And if not, then why not (e.g. complexity, better theories, different level of analysis, etc.)?

The Two-Stream Hypothesis, where object properties are processed independently from spatial information, remains the most well established theory of visual processing. However, it concerns me that most models that reference this theory stop at the end of the two streams; they never say how the mind translates those sources of information into action.

  • Are there models and/or theories out there that try and situate the Two Streams of information into a full perception action cycle?
  • And if not, then why not (e.g. complexity, better theories, different level of analysis, etc.)?
Source Link
zergylord
  • 2.4k
  • 17
  • 33

Any models that act using both streams of visual processing?

The Two-Stream Hypothesis, where object properties are processed independently from spatial information, remains the most well established theory of visual processing. However, it concerns me that most models that reference this theory stop at the end of the two streams; they never say how the mind translates those sources of information into action. Are there models and/or theories out there that try and situate the Two Streams of information into a full perception action cycle? And if not, then why not (e.g. complexity, better theories, different level of analysis, etc.)?