Timeline for What are the major changes in the APA Publication Manual from 5th to 6th editions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Oct 10, 2019 at 12:43 | history | suggested | Michele Dorigatti |
Added apa-style tag
|
|
| Oct 9, 2019 at 21:15 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Oct 10, 2019 at 12:43 | |||||
| Aug 14, 2012 at 0:25 | review | Close votes | |||
| Dec 19, 2012 at 15:06 | |||||
| May 15, 2012 at 6:35 | vote | accept | Jeromy Anglim | ||
| Feb 9, 2012 at 23:32 | history | edited | Jeromy Anglim |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 9, 2012 at 7:48 | answer | added | Jeromy Anglim | timeline score: 5 | |
| Feb 8, 2012 at 23:29 | comment | added | Jeromy Anglim | @ArtemKaznatcheev The 6th edition is fairly new. Some journals are still using the 5th. Some templates are still stuck in the 5th. People may know the 5th, but there will always be a first time for the 6th. For something as important as a journal submission, you may want to get it right. Of course reading the actual 6th edition is a good idea, but a reasonable online overview of the changes would presumably be helpful. | |
| Feb 8, 2012 at 23:24 | comment | added | Artem Kaznatcheev | I am still skeptical about this question, does anyone (except students learning for the first time) actually check their papers for APA style? I just have LaTeX (or Word) auto-format it for me according to the journal's style-sheet. | |
| Feb 8, 2012 at 23:16 | comment | added | Jeromy Anglim | Okay, I've removed the tag. I agree we don't want a whole pile of simple questions related to APA style (e.g., "where do I put the comma" type questions) | |
| Feb 8, 2012 at 23:13 | history | edited | Jeromy Anglim |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 8, 2012 at 14:21 | comment | added | Ben Brocka | I agree with @ArtemKaznatcheev, while this question is on topic I'd hate to start getting "Is this okay under APA style" questions. | |
| Feb 8, 2012 at 11:03 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackCogSci/status/167201982111694848 | ||
| Feb 8, 2012 at 6:47 | comment | added | Artem Kaznatcheev | I would not introduce the apa-style tag... do we want cogsci to become an apa-style reference site? It is okay to ask about research practice (and to have a tag for that) but creating subtags for very specific parts of research-practice (like apa-style) seems dangerous. | |
| Feb 8, 2012 at 5:59 | history | edited | Jeromy Anglim | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Feb 8, 2012 at 5:49 | comment | added | Jeromy Anglim | As this is the first question about publication process rather than substantive content, I've asked the question on meta about whether people see such questions as in scope for the site: meta.cogsci.stackexchange.com/questions/152 | |
| Feb 8, 2012 at 5:44 | history | asked | Jeromy Anglim | CC BY-SA 3.0 |