14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 15 '15 at 22:42 comment added Artem Kaznatcheev @Josh I agree with Christian, basic neuroscience question are very much on-topic here.
May 15 '15 at 6:04 answer honi timeline score: 5
May 15 '15 at 5:58 comment added honi you all spend way too much effort policing what is and is not acceptable questions
May 14 '15 at 7:57 comment added Christian Hummeluhr @AliceD Great! I also agree with Josh that this is a good boundary question, and would upvote a Meta answer to that effect.
May 14 '15 at 6:32 comment added AliceD @ChristianHummeluhr - If basic neuroscience is CogSci, then this question should stay.
May 14 '15 at 6:12 comment added Christian Hummeluhr @AliceD My reasoning is that "basic" neuroscience falls within a cognitive science, much like neural network questions do (i.e., anyone would learn about action potentials and EPSPs during their undergrad and could answer it with a bit of reading, unlike more involved bio/neuro questions). If you think this is actually an involved biophysical question, I may reconsider. We do not need a biophysics tag.
May 14 '15 at 1:59 comment added AliceD @Josh - I think this question could be a nice boundary-defining question regarding Neurobiology questions? meta.cogsci.stackexchange.com/questions/966/…
May 14 '15 at 1:57 comment added AliceD @ChristianHummeluhr - given your answer meta.cogsci.stackexchange.com/questions/966/… I would tend to say that this question crosses the CogSci boundaries and I agree with Josh. This question can be grouped entirely under Biophysics which is, and probably should be non-existent here at CogSci. I am happy to answer, though, and happy to accept its inclusion here at CogSci. In that case I will create a Biophysics tag and add an answer to the Meta question regarding the outcome of this discussion.
May 14 '15 at 1:51 comment added AliceD Could you add some references to,e.g., 'other sources'? Additionally, do you include action potentials in your definition of EPSPs or not?
May 14 '15 at 1:22 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackCogSci/status/598659501785481217
May 13 '15 at 15:30 comment added Christian Hummeluhr I'm okay with it, basic neuroscience seems within scope for us.
May 13 '15 at 15:28 history edited Christian Hummeluhr CC BY-SA 3.0
clarified EPSP
May 13 '15 at 15:05 comment added Josh de Leeuw This would probably be better suited for Bio.SE.
May 13 '15 at 14:43 history asked visual-kinetic CC BY-SA 3.0